Even though the movie’s name is Public Enemies it focuses on telling the story of one public enemy: John Dillinger (played by Johnny Depp), a renowned bank robber from the 1930s. For those who like their trivia the years 1931-1935 are sometimes referred to as the age of public enemies, because of a large amount of professional criminals. Dillinger of course robbed banks and shot a lot of police doing so. In the movie he ends up being chased by a squad of FBI police led by Melvin Purvis (Christian Bale).
Looking at the police in this movie it’s no wonder an age of public enemies took place. There are two jail breaks and a lot of bank robberies in the movie and during each one of them the police are so incompetent that the prisoners and robbers seem to escape and rob with ease. This goes for each time the police are close to catching Dillinger’s gang as well. The picture I got was that anyone with a black trenchcoat, a machine gun and a fast car could rob a bank in the 1930s.
For me the biggest flaw of Public Enemies are the action scenes. For a movie with prison escapes, bank robberies and shootouts all of the action should be top-notch. First off there isn’t any suspense to the action. With a cat and mouse chase like this I’d like to feel excited. This is perhaps because the characters don’t get developed, so I didn’t really care what happened to the characters as they weren’t fleshed out at all. There’s also perhaps too many characters: names just keep flying at you throughout the movie and half the time you don’t know which character is being followed. But the bigger problem is the way the action is shot with an overly use of shaky-cam. Most of the time I didn’t know what’s happening with the camera jumping and bouncing then quickly cutting somewhere else. The result was chaos more befitting a war movie. In a gangster piece it felt out of place.
What also brought war movies to mind were the gun sounds, which were way over the top. At one point a rifle being shot made a sound resembling a huge explosion(and no, it didn’t explode into anyones hands). Some might call it realistic in the sense that, well, gunshots are very loud, but when compared to action pieces set in modern day, I felt the loud gunshots were a bit ridiculous, considering any bigger explosion or gun today has more power and thus sound than anything in the 1930s.
The reason I’m concentrating so much on the action is that there wasn’t that much else in the movie to like. The characters are well acted, but none of them made a very big impression. The dialogue might have something to do with that in the sense that there’s not a lot of talking that deepens the characters. John Dillinger has a girlfriend in the movie and their relationship is one of the bigger aspects in the movie, but even that seems very superficial. I might have enjoyed the movie more if I knew all the historical equivalents of the characters, which might have given them more depth and made them more interesting.
I’m surprised that Michael Mann directed Public Enemies. I just loved Collateral and Heat, both of which, as a side note, had a lot of good dialogue and living and breathing characters. It might be that the script for Public Enemies was hard to work with. I can imagine how hard it is to write a script about the life of a historical person. All excuses aside I can’t see very much to like about the movie: The action didn’t work for me, the characters were bland and there was too many of them. If you aren’t the biggest John Dillinger fan out there don’t go see this, or atleast wait for it to come on out DVD, or even TV.
The trailer makes this film look extremely good. Quess there wasn’t enough good stuff to last 2 and half hours.